How can atheists prove Deists/Transcendentalists wrong?
You ought to look up the definition of Deism. It implies that there is a creator who does not interact with the world. There is no evidence that the universe was created. If you think it was, it’s up to you to prove it. And, yes, people are subject to the laws of nature. However, “Nature” refers to the total collection of things that are. It is a convenient word to refer to a collective of things, but is not a thing itself. You can’t point at a thing and say, “That thing is a nature.” There’s no such referent. Naturally-occurring things exist. Nature-in-itself does not. EDIT: Let’s get something clear here. I know Atheistic philosophy…probably better than anybody at R&S, from what I can tell. I’ve been studying this for several years. You, obviously, never have. It is abundantly clear. You use a link. I can open up a library of books for and against each section. But, instead of arguing from supposed authority, I’m challenging the very method by which you are arguing. I’m arguing the
