How does that– you explained how the rule which affects the scientific conclusions, how does it affect the religious issue?
A. If you only have one solution allowed to the question of where did we come from and the answer to that question is, in broad strokes, we came by some naturalistic undirected, unguided process that essentially is an accident. This has been clarified by Jacquest Monud, the Noble Prize winner, says man has to understand he is merely an accident. Now, I understand that many of us in this room may be accidents, but not in the sense he was talking about. That view is a naturalistic world view that presumes that undirected, unplanned causes were at work from the very beginning and what we have here today on earth is simply luck acted upon by law. It’s just– we’re just lucky to be here. It’s just a chance thing. Now, that, of course, is an explanation for origins, where we came from, that I said religious– you know, every religion has a statement about, has a view about. They’re not all the same of course, but they all weigh in on that issue. And if science weighs in with a– one perspect
