Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If Allama Mashriqi was against the creation of Pakistan, then why should he be considered a founding father of the country?

0
Posted

If Allama Mashriqi was against the creation of Pakistan, then why should he be considered a founding father of the country?

0

All I can say is that anyone who fought for the freedom of British India should be considered a founding father of both Pakistan and India. Mere drawing room politics could not have brought independence; it is well-known that achieving freedom requires resistance and sacrifice. For this reason, Mashriqi and the Khaksars fight for independence cannot be overlooked; many Khaksars were imprisoned or killed during the freedom movement and Mashriqi himself was imprisoned almost a half a dozen times. The reality is that Pakistan and India could not have achieved freedom without the sacrifices and painstaking efforts of people like Mashriqi and the Khaksars.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.