Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Should unsatisfactory colposcopy necessitate treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1?

0
Posted

Should unsatisfactory colposcopy necessitate treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1?

0

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse among women undergoing cone biopsy for CIN 1, stratified by colposcopic adequacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study was performed using a colposcopic database of 3,004 women seen between August 1999 and December 2005. Data collected included demographic information, indications for treatment, adequacy of colposcopic examination, and final cone pathology. A satisfactory colposcopy was defined as being able to define the entire squamocolumnar junction and visualize all lesions in their entirety. Descriptive statistics and crude and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 440 cone biopsies, 50 (11%) were done for CIN 1, of which 9 (18%) demonstrated CIN 2 or worse, and 23 (46%) were done in the setting of unsatisfactory colposcopy. Compared with women with satisfactory colposcopy, women with unsatisfactory colposcopy were more likely

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.