Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What is the difference between the Molecular Workbench and other molecular visualization tools?

0
Posted

What is the difference between the Molecular Workbench and other molecular visualization tools?

0

Most molecular visualization tools display molecular structures without letting users change them. MW is designed with the goal of not only visualizing structures, but also constructing structures (existing or non-existing) and simulating the physical and chemical processes they will undergo. In a typical visualization, students have to infer what is going on between static frames of structures. Whereas in MW, phenomena just emerge from dynamical simulations, and thus the gap can be filled (we hope). The model is artificial — atoms are not spherical. We agree that atoms are not spherical. More than ten years ago, IBM had manipulated atoms and shown nice STM images, which reveals that the atomic world is by no mean composed of ball-like hard spheres. However, many chemistry educators have long used static ball-and-stick models, physical or computer, to teach chemistry. Those models traditionally use color balls to represent atoms. In our study, we also suspect that non-science majors

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.