Why have some writers accused Mashriqi of causing division and dissension among the Muslims?
Unfortunately, anti-Mashriqi writers have fabricated stories and twisted facts in an attempt to create this perception of Mashriqi. The reality is that Mashriqi believed in uniting not dividing people, regardless of class, color, or creed. For example, consider that even when the All-India Muslim League, in a 1943 resolution, banned Leaguers from joining the Khaksar Tehrik, Mashriqi still did not stop Khaksars from becoming members of the Muslim League; the Khaksars were allowed to maintain membership in both parties at the same time (for example, Nawab Bahadur Yar Jung was a member of both parties simultaneously). How then, could Mashriqi possibly be accused of causing dissension among the Muslims?
Related Questions
- I was wondering why, or if, an accuseds time spent in pretrial should count as double time towards his sentence, especially if the accused is the one who is causing the delays?
- Why have some writers accused Mashriqi of causing division and dissension among the Muslims?
- What kinds of things were the witches accused of causing to happen?
