Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why were samples of blood, hair or other human tissues not collected and analyzed for the risk assessment?

0
Posted

Why were samples of blood, hair or other human tissues not collected and analyzed for the risk assessment?

0

The human health risk assessment did not indicate the need for collection and analysis of metals in human tissue. In most cases it is difficult to interpret the results of these types of measurements in a meaningful way. Lead and arsenic are exceptions. IF anyone is concerned about exposure to lead, monitoring can be arranged by their general physician for blood analysis. In addition, an Arsenic exposure study was conducted in the Town of Falconbridge. Although soil arsenic levels were higher in this community than in a nearby reference community, no additional arsenic was present in people living in the Town of Falconbridge compared to the reference community. The results of that study can be found in Appendix N of Volume II of the Sudbury Soils Study (Human Health Risk Assessment).

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.