Are there nuances of identity and different strategies among organized European Nazi children ?
There is a line of evolution from “Children of Nazis” through “Nazi Children” and over to “Second Generation Nazis”. Liberalist Humanists will call the evolution regression. The first category is without energy to self-help, to self-organization, to find self-identity. That’s why “Children of Nazis” are administrated by Nazi parents, by psychologists or by organizations dealing with Holocaust. The children do not resolve the question of guilt. Or they continue to carry individually their parents’ guilt, or their parents’ guilt is inflicted on them during encounters with psychologists. Werkgroep Herkenning in Holland is an association for “Children of Nazis”. “Nazi Children”, the second category, functions without official approval and manage to work in a polarized position to the “world society” for a limited time. They take the weight of the “Nazi” word in order to paralyze its demonizing effect, like the homosexuals once won over the stigmatizing word “queer” by adopting it. Their ai
