Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Bob, why were there never as many archeologists in the Denver Service Center?

0
Posted

Bob, why were there never as many archeologists in the Denver Service Center?

0

Also, they seem to have played a different role than historians. Bob: I suppose part of it is the parochialism of archeology. But the Denver Service Center did have archeologists. In my time I don’t remember anyone other than Will Logan. Will did play principally a management and planning role similar to what I have been saying the historians should have played. I think the explanation is to be found in the rise, contemporaneously, of the archeological centers. Archeological research and the related professional services to management came out of the archeological centers. I always felt strongly that the park planning services ought to come from archeologists in the Denver Service Center, but that was a hard case to make when archeological centers already existed. They existed because this got to be a political thing with Hartzog. He saw political advantages in having archeological centers tied in with universities. This was a Connally ideal also. I think he may have sold it to Hartzog

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.