Can chest X-rays and ventilation/perfusion scans be interpreted reliably from personal computer screens?
A computer-based system is routinely used for home reporting of nuclear medicine scans performed out of hours in our unit. To report ventilation/perfusion scans (V/Q) adequately, chest radiographs are also digitized and transferred to the home personal computer. One hundred consecutive V/Q scans and their corresponding chest X-rays were reported on a personal computer and on a lightbox by two radiologists and two nuclear physicians. This study shows that ventilation/perfusion scans can be reliably reported from computer screen images. The loss of data when chest X-rays are digitized to a 512 x 512 matrix, however, results in considerable misinterpretation and the digitized chest X-ray may, at best, be unhelpful and, at worst, result in an incorrect V/Q scan report.
Related Questions
- Does compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation generate adequate passive ventilation during cardiac arrest?
- Can chest X-rays and ventilation/perfusion scans be interpreted reliably from personal computer screens?
- how reliably can mental health professionals make judgments about the cause of symptoms?
