Can evidence obtained by “bugging” someone be used in court?
I do not know which country you are over which a particular statute of anti-wire tapping is observed. But nonetheless, under the wire tapping law, it provides that: It shall be unlawful for any person, not being authorized by all the parties to any private communication or spoken word, to tap any wire or cable, or by using any other device or arrangement, to secretly overhear, intercept, or record such communication or spoken word by using a device commonly known as a dictaphone or dictagraph or detectaphone or walkie-talkie or tape recorder … and any evidence obtained in violation of this, shall not be admissible as evidence in any proceedings, whether administrative or judicial. Further, anyone who will violate this law, without authority, bugged or intercept a private conversation, will be subject to prosecution for violation of the right to privacy and the anti-wire tapping law. However, should there be a court order authorizing the bugging of any conversation, this will be an en
