Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Can substructure in the Galactic halo explain the ATIC and PAMELA results?

0
Posted

Can substructure in the Galactic halo explain the ATIC and PAMELA results?

0

Recently, ATIC and PAMELA measured an anomalously large flux of leptonic cosmic rays which may arise from dark matter self-annihilation. While the annihilation signal predicted for a smooth halo is 102–103 times smaller than the measured excess, the signal can be boosted by the presence of subhalos. We investigate the feasibility of large boost factors using a new Monte Carlo calculation technique that is constrained by previous simulation work on halo substructure. The model accounts for the observed decrease in the amount of substructure with decreasing halo mass and the scatter in halo structural parameters such as the density concentration parameter. Our results suggest that boost factors of ∼102 are highly unlikely and are ruled out at ≳14σ within the context of our model. We conclude that substructure alone, at least with commonly assumed annihilation cross sections, cannot explain the anomalous flux measured by ATIC and PAMELA.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.