Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI?

0
Posted

Does bone SPECT actually have lower sensitivity for detecting vertebral metastasis than MRI?

0

We compared the ability of bone SPECT and MRI to detect vertebral metastasis. METHODS: Skeletal scintigraphy, including planar and SPECT imaging, and spinal MRI examinations, were performed in 22 cancer patients in whom a total of 88 metastatic foci and 12 degenerative joint disease lesions were detected. Metastatic foci were defined as lesions that suggested metastasis on MRI and/or bone destruction on radiographs or CT and/or aggravation of increased tracer uptakes on serial bone scans. Image reconstruction of axial, coronal and sagittal sections was processed in a 128 X 128 matrix. MRI studies were performed with a 1.5 tesla signal scanner using fast spin-echo sequences. T1- and T2-weighted images were obtained in the sagittal plane. RESULTS: Twenty patients had at least one vertebral metastasis. MRI diagnosed 86 of the 88 (97.7%) metastatic foci; bone SPECT correctly diagnosed 81 of 88 (92.0%); and planar imaging detected 62 of 88 (70.4%). The two vertebrae with metastasis not dete

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.