Does coronary angioplasty after timely thrombolysis improve microvascular perfusion and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction?
GROUND: Recent data show that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable postthrombolytic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is better than no PCI or ischemia-guided PCI. These results still have to find a pathophysiologic explanation. We hypothesized that complete mechanical recanalization of infarct-related artery improves clinical benefits of thrombolysis as a result of more preserved and better perfused coronary microcirculation. To test this hypothesis, we studied a selected STEMI population presenting very early after symptom onset in whom successful infarct-related artery reperfusion was obtained by thrombolysis followed or not by elective PCI within 24 hours, and we compared these 2 groups with those underwent primary PCI. METHODS: This study analyzed 96 patients with STEMI randomized within 3 hours from symptom onset to primary PCI (group A, n = 36), tenecteplase followed within 24 hours by PCI (group B, n = 30), or to tenecteplase alone (
Related Questions
- Does coronary angioplasty after timely thrombolysis improve microvascular perfusion and left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction?
- Can coronary systolic-diastolic flow differences be predicted by left ventricular pressure or time-varying intramyocardial elastance?
- Does left ventricular hypertrophy identify the increased risk of coronary heart disease among UK Indian Asians?
