Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Doesn’t the January 2004 explosion at an LNG facility in Algeria prove that LNG is dangerous?

0
Posted

Doesn’t the January 2004 explosion at an LNG facility in Algeria prove that LNG is dangerous?

0

No. The Algeria explosion took place at an LNG export liquefaction plant – not an import terminal. A board of inquiry determined that a gas leak was the primary cause of the accident. A nearby boiler was the source of the ignition, which ignited the vapor cloud in a confined space causing an explosion and fire. LNG import terminals do not use steam boilers. It should be noted that even the resulting fire did not damage LNG storage tanks that are similar to those that would be used at an import terminal.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.