fossils go back a bit further, and are preceded by australopithecines? Lubenows supposed exceptions to this chronology are all based on quite dubious identifications.
This is what the creation model would predict, that is, it is what we would expect if creation were true. The evidence, in fact, is so strong for the creation model of human origins that it is extremely unlikely that any future fossil discoveries would weaken it. New fossil discoveries have only strengthened the creationist position, which is why it is understandable that evolutionist books no longer carry this type of human fossil chart. Charts of bits and pieces of the human fossil record abound in evolutionary books, but one will not find a time chart that places all of the relevant human fossil material on a time chart according to the morphological description of the individual fossils. If you are interested in learning more about the evolutionist perspective on human evolution, check out the fossil hominids FAQ by Jim Foley. I do commend Gordon for including a link to my pages; he is the only creationist I know of who has done so. Myth: There are very few hominid fossils. The pub
