How comparable are results of colocalization coefficients obtained using CoLocalizer Pro with the results I can get using similar tool of confocal microscopes?
The results are fully comparable, because CoLocalizer Pro uses the same algorithms as the confocal microscopes software. However, you are getting more coefficients using CoLocalizer Pro and the data you obtain (both calculations and images) can be used on standard spreadsheet and image-editing programs like Microsoft Excel, Adobe Photoshop, GraphicConverter, etc. You are also not tied to the confocal microscope for analyzing samples. As CoLocalizer Pro is the only native Mac OS X application in this field, Macintosh users especially appreciate it. That is why CoLocalizer Pro is so popular and used by many researchers worldwide.
Related Questions
- How comparable are results of colocalization coefficients obtained using CoLocalizer Pro with the results I can get using similar tool of confocal microscopes?
- How comparable are the results obtained with the FLIPR Calcium Assay Kit to those from standard protocols using the conventional fluo-3 and fluo-4 dyes?
- How comparable are the results obtained with the FLIPR Membrane Potential Assay Kit to the standard protocol using DiBAC?