Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

How does top-down timing design differ from back-end timing analysis?

0
Posted

How does top-down timing design differ from back-end timing analysis?

0

The key feature of a top-down timing design methodology is an up-front analysis of system timing (usually using timing diagrams) right at the beginning of the design cycle, where errors can be quickly corrected. Back-end timing analyzers such as digital simulators and static timing analyzers require the designer to have already committed to a specific circuit implementation, which is usually specified as a schematic or HDL netlist with associated simulation models. This requirement for a nearly completed design prior to beginning timing analysis means that any timing errors discovered during a back-end analysis may result in a significant redesign effort. In addition, when timing or logic errors are found at this stage, any circuit changes must be reflected in many different places: the schematic, model descriptions, testbench stimulus for the simulator or timing analyzer, and documentation accompanying the design. Top-down timing design helps the designer discover timing errors earlie

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.