How was the Scopes trial more complicated than a simple debate between evolutionists and creationists?
Head Note: Edward J. Larson is a historian who wrote a Pulitzer Prize winning book on the Scopes trial called Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial and Americas Continuing Debate over Science and Religion. He traces the rise of fundamentalist Christianity in the 1920s. Fundamentalists opposed “modernism,” which claimed that humans wrote the Bible and that its stories should be interpreted, rather than assumed to be literally true. Middle ground did exist between modernism and fundamentalism but gained little attention in the public debate surrounding the Scopes trial. . . . The popular press seemed intent on pitting fundamentalists . . . against modernists . . . or against agnostics . . . all of whom scorned the middle. . . . Christians caught in the middle sat on the sidelines. “The thing that we got from the trial of Scopes,” a Memphis Commercial Appeal editorial observed, was that the most “sincere believers in religion” simply wanted to avoid the origins dispute altogether. “Some h
