How will the CE-ATA organization co-exist with existing industry organizations such as MMCA who are developing similar protocols?
CE-ATA is being developed with the intent to augment the existing MMC interface with enhancements tailored to efficiently support Parallel ATA hard disk drives. These enhancements do not preclude base MMC compatibility. Conceptually, if the enhancements are not used a device can revert to MMC operation. CE-ATA is based on collaboration. Accordingly, measures to ensure that the development of CE-ATA does not directly impact or hinder other work within MMCA or other standards bodies are on-going and offer value to the industry.
Related Questions
- What are the criteria and business value to an organization for selecting CIQ over the other similar standards in defining the organizations baseline architecture?
- How will the CE-ATA organization co-exist with existing industry organizations such as MMCA who are developing similar protocols?
- What are the predominant carbon footprinting protocols/organizations that have applicability in industry and business?
