Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

If I already have a dummy fill methodology with Hercules™, why do I need PrimeYield CMP?

0
Posted

If I already have a dummy fill methodology with Hercules™, why do I need PrimeYield CMP?

0

While the rule-based approach to dummy fill has been effective for earlier technology nodes, it is no longer viable at 65nm. In those older approaches, metal density is normalized by adding additional metal in the empty space, and by slotting the wide metal channels. These approaches did not consider the cumulative effect of metal fill on subsequent layers. PrimeYield CMP considers the density and thickness of each layer when computing the planarity of a given design layer.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.