Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is adult size a potential confounder of grip strength vs SF-36 associations?

0
Posted

Is adult size a potential confounder of grip strength vs SF-36 associations?

0

Adult size was related to SF-36 scores and to grip strength. Higher weight was associated with poorer PF, RP, VT, BP and RE in men [ORs for poor SF-36 scores per standard deviation (SD) increase in weight ranged from 1.2 to 1.3, P-values = 0.01 to <0.001] and with poorer scores for all domains other than MH in women (ORs ranging from 1.2 to 1.8, P-values = 0.02 to <0.001). Shorter height was associated with increased likelihood of having poor GH scores among men (OR for poor GH score: 1.1 per SD increase in height, P = 0.02) and increased likelihood of having poor PF, VT and GH scores in women (OR = 1.1 for all, P = 0.03, P = 0.02 and P = 0.02). In addition, weight and height were positively correlated with grip strength in men (Pearson correlations and P-values: r = 0.24, P<0.001 for weight; r = 0.40, P<0.0001 for height) and women (r = 0.08, P = 0.003 for weight; r = 0.28, P<0.0001 for height). Hence, weight had the potential to mask (i.e. to negatively confound) any relationship bet

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.