Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is feminism against the design of nature, taking a step backwards from specialization?

0
Posted

Is feminism against the design of nature, taking a step backwards from specialization?

0

No. There is a difference between specialization and oppression. Feminism is about the social, economic, political, and spiritual equality of the sexes. That’s it. Your answer seems to assume that a social structure of patriarchy is a design of nature, and has always been. This is not so. Believe it or not, according to sociologists and anthropologists, humans didn’t always have such a patriarchy in social structure. There was nothing to fight over before our technology advanced to the point that we could accumulate excess. Many – if not most – anthropologists credit females with agriculture. There were societies in the past where the women dominated. In hunting and gathering societies, men hunted and women gathered (in general). The gathering was a more stable food source, and women had a lot of social power. The oldest figures believed to represent religious belief are of females, which makes sense if you think about it. Before humans understood the connection between sex, sperm, and

0

Nature does not have “design”, nature evolves. Human culture and societal norms, including equality, are a part of that evolution.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.