Is it not the case that doctrinal support is considered interference in the Lebanese affairs?
We must not mix matters up. I explained that we are not responsible for the escalation of the crisis in Lebanon. No country should interfere in the internal affairs of another country; nor should a movement interfere with the affairs of another. Every society is obligated by the national interest, its political agenda and social benefits. There is no relationship between conditions and national belonging and there is nothing in our creed that states that. I reaffirm that we are committed to the decisions our countries, similarly Hezbollah is committed to the rules and regulations of Lebanon and is also committed to the conditions governing the country. We must remove this fear and phobia in order to interpret clearly the Shiite scene in the region. We should not confuse issues. What I call for and what I am committed to is the national agenda of our homelands and we are currently working to embed this culture in the minds of the youth. In the Gulf, we have supported the official positi
Related Questions
- Considering the provisions in the Sharia Law, how do I ensure that my family has a means of support in case I die in the UAE, pending release of my estate to them?
- Is it not the case that doctrinal support is considered interference in the Lebanese affairs?
- What production volume is needed to support a business case for hydroforming?
