Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Is LGT or Divergence a Better Explanation of Mitochondrial Genome Evolution?

0
Posted

Is LGT or Divergence a Better Explanation of Mitochondrial Genome Evolution?

0

To test the impact of LGT on the present mitochondrial data we examined the spectrum of phylogenetic signals for a given set of data and compared it to the spectrum obtained for a well-established phylogeny that contains sequences of different degrees of divergence. In doing this, phylogenetic signal could be expressed in many ways. A particularly convenient way is in terms of tree-splits (which are equivalent to edges, branches, or bipartitions). Internal splits separate OTUs (operational taxonomical units, in this case sequences) into two groups. External splits separate a single OTU from all other OTUs. Real data usually contain external splits and conflicting internal splits. For small numbers of OTUs, support for all splits under a specified model of sequence evolution can be calculated directly using a Hadamard transformation (Penny et al. 1996; Lockhart et al. 1999). For larger data sets, one heuristic approach is to use NNet, which provides a list of major splits, including con

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.