Is macro evolution a scientific fact?
For years evolutionists have shown pictures of the horse in what was supposed to have been its stages of development, beginning with a small horse about the size of a dog and ending with the horse as we know it today. Not all scientists agree the first two creatures pictured were horses. Whether the first two were or not, the pictures show a change has taken place. The fact remains, however, that the creature which began as a horse remained a horse. Even the evolutionists state the creatures shown are horses. Such a change within a given kind of creature is called micro evolution. It is incorrect to reason, however, that since a change of a limited nature within a kind has occurred, therefore, broad changes also occur, in which one kind of a creature evolves into a different kind of a creature. For example, it is incorrect to think that reptiles likely dropped their skin to grow feathers in the process of changing into birds. Micro evolution, small change, does not prove macro evolutio
