I realize some Bible scholars that I have a high opinion of endorse this new version, such as Chuck Missler and Robert Morey. However, I see the same problem with the New Testament as with the NIV and NASB in my opinion. You have apparently used the Greek text which is based on the Greek text developed by Westcott and Hort. No, we didn’t. We used a bunch of texts. Please see the principles of translation listed in the front matter of the ISV for our policy on this. You can also visit our web page that discusses this on line, if you wish. Actually, Westcott and Hort is only one of the text’s we examined in producing the ISV New Testament. But because WH is only a conflation, as are the Nestle and UBS texts, we didn’t confine our analysis to mere conflations only. Why do you think this Greek text (I won’t mention all of the weaknesses I think it has here) instead of the TR? This sentence has no verb in it, so I can’t answer it! If you mean “Why did we use WH instead of TR to produce the