Is the key impediment in arriving at justice, the lack of discussion and the general debate about topics?
General debates can draw attention to the injustices in the world. You can’t say that the injustice is arising due to lack of conversation. Supposing you have been locked up in a room. And you later complain that you were stuck there for four hours, no one came and took you out. And one of the persons who helped you eventually says well, we were not in a position to help because you were not shouting. If you were shouting, we would have come and opened the door. That would mean that your not shouting played a part in your remaining incarcerated but to say that you were jailed or you were shut up in that room because you were not shouting would be a mistake. So conversation, public argument, political agitation, public meeting, debate, discussion, media reporting, all these are ways of remedying an injustice. But that doesn’t mean the injustice is caused by the absence of those initiatives. What about the role of institutions in delivering justice? Well there are three things here. Firs
