Isn’t it true that without the Electoral College, the candidates would only care about California, Texas and New York and big cities?
No. The United States is a large nation. California, New York and Texas are our most populous states, but even if a candidate (quite unrealistically) won every single vote cast in those states, he or she would still have barely 25% of the vote. Indeed, a candidate could win every single vote cast in the ten biggest states and still not have a majority of the national popular vote. Because big states are geographically dispersed and every vote is equal, any candidate trying to win a majority of national vote must try to win votes everywhere, and volunteers excited by that candidacy have every incentive to be active right in their own neighborhood, knowing that any new vote cast for their candidate will count the same as any vote cast anywhere else. In contrast, it is at least statistically possible under the current system that a candidate could win the presidency by stringing together wins in all the largest states while doing very poorly everywhere lese. The great majority of American
Related Questions
- Isn’t it true that without the Electoral College, the candidates would only care about California, Texas and New York and big cities?
- Isn’t it true that without the Electoral College, the candidates would only care about California, Texas, New York, and major cities?
- Does Big City Vacation Rentals only have vacation rentals in big cities like New York?
