Isn this just “character assassination” of Prof. Moore on your part, exactly as skeptics like Dave Thomas and Tim Printy charge?
Moore’s statement (via Thomas) that he “didn’t want to get into the math.” amounted to his admission that his math was indefensible. It would only be “character assassination” if Brad Sparks and I were falsely characterizing what Moore had done or said. We are not responsible for Moore’s hoaxing, only pointing out that he has clearly done so. Debunkers like Thomas and Printy can’t defend Moore’s actions, so they attack the messengers instead (the real “character assassination”) awhile ducking the actual issues.
