Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Lawrence has many questions about why the United States is seriously considering war with Iraq. He wonders: Why the nation would go to war with Iraq, but not with North Korea, which has acknowledged the existence of its nuclear weapons program?

0
Posted

Lawrence has many questions about why the United States is seriously considering war with Iraq. He wonders: Why the nation would go to war with Iraq, but not with North Korea, which has acknowledged the existence of its nuclear weapons program?

0

Hmm, let’s see, Lawrence. Maybe because the Norks already have nuclear weapons and Iraq doesn’t? I’m not sure what this question is supposed to mean. Does it mean that we shouldn’t go to war with someone until they have sufficient means to cause horrific casualties amongst US troops? Or does it mean that we should drop plans to go to war with Iraq and attack North Korea instead? Or does it mean that because we can’t prevail everywhere, then we should not make the effort to prevail anywhere.

Related Questions