Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

MacroModel contains a variety of force fields. Which is best for my purpose?

0
Posted

MacroModel contains a variety of force fields. Which is best for my purpose?

0

Each of the MacroModel force fields has strengths, but in general, the most complete and well parameterized force fields are MMFF, OPLS_2001, and OPLS_2005. The other force fields are routinely used for special situations; for example, when using united atoms (AMBER*) or when reproducing or extending previous results. Although there are no absolute guidelines available for choosing the most appropriate MacroModel force field for a given molecular modeling application, the following generalizations are reasonable: OPLS_2005: Probably the best available force field for condensed-phase simulation of peptides. Work to develop parameterization that will include broader classes of drug-like molecules is ongoing. OPLS_2001: Is a solid implementation of the OPLS-AA force field. GB/SA solvation energies are good. MMFF: An excellent force field for biopolymers and many organic molecules that do not have parameters in other force fields. The MMFFs extension of this force field is also supported.

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.