Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Restrictive ventricular septal defect: how small is too small to close?

0
Posted

Restrictive ventricular septal defect: how small is too small to close?

0

CL Backer, RC Winters, VR Zales, H Takami, AJ Muster, DW Benson Jr and C Mavroudis Division of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgery, Children’s Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois 60614. Historically, indications for ventricular septal defect closure have included congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, aortic insufficiency with or without aortic valve prolapse, and prior bacterial endocarditis. However, controversy exists as to how the lifetime risk of an isolated, nonoperated restrictive ventricular septal defect compares with the risk of surgical closure in an asymptomatic child. Between 1980 and 1991, cardiac catheterization and elective ventricular septal defect closure (age > 1 year, pulmonary to systemic flow ratio < 2.0) were performed in 141 patients aged 1 to 23 years (mean age, 6.1 +/- 4.7 years). Mean systolic pulmonary artery pressure was 26.9 +/- 13.0 mm Hg, and mean pulmonary to systemic flow ratio was 1.6 +/- 0.3. Aortic valve prolapse was present in 63 patients (

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.