The system rates and ranks candidates, but are panels of subject-matter experts also used in the rating process?
A38: FSJO eliminates the need for subject-matter panels to rate applications because the system rates and ranks the applicants responses automatically. (See Q&A 40 for subject-matter expert use in the certification process.) Q39: Since the system assigns a rating based on my responses to the position-specific questions, what prevents me from providing inaccurate or misleading answers to the questions in a way that gives a higher score? A39: Falsifying or answering questions to mislead the systems automated process is no different than providing false or misleading information on an application under the old process. Applicants are reminded that this is a Federal job application system. For Federal employees, providing false information, creating fake IDs, or failing to answer all questions truthfully and completely may be grounds for disciplinary action, up to and including removal. Falsifying a Federal job application, or attempting to compromise this system is punishable by a fine or
Related Questions
- Who selected the SMEs for developing and rating the newly certified languages selected, and what process was used?
- The system rates and ranks candidates, but are panels of subject-matter experts also used in the rating process?
- What is the default rubric used in ISTART7 and how is it related to the rating system in ISTAR?
