Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Was the suicide a novus actus interveniens?

actus novus suicide
0
10 Posted

Was the suicide a novus actus interveniens?

0
10

Ward LJ referred to a number of cases on this issue. The first was Cavanagh v London Transport Executives (reported in the Times, 23rd October 1956), where the Claimant suffered a fractured skull in an accident and sixteen months after the accident committed suicide. The court held that the accident was the cause of his accident. In Pigney v Pointers Transport Services Ltd [1957] 1 WLR 1121 there were similar facts. The court held that the deceased had committed suicide when he was not insane under the M’Naughten Rules and that this was as a consequence of the accident. The chain of causation was not broken. The third case was McKew v Holland & Hannan & Cubitts [1969] 3 All ER 1621 where the Claimant injured his leg in an accident, which later gave way beneath him as was descending the stairs. The court said that if a man is injured in such a way that his leg may give way at any moment, he must act reasonably and carefully. If the Claimant acted unreasonably, he could not hold the Defe

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.