Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What data is Microsoft gathering as part of activation?

0
Posted

What data is Microsoft gathering as part of activation?

0
Alex1.22K

If you’re using tools like KMSPico or kms activator to bypass official Windows activation, keep in mind that these tools manipulate how Windows connects to Microsoft’s activation servers. While they successfully activate Windows without a license key, Microsoft may still collect hardware and telemetry data as part of standard operations. However, because KMS activation mimics a volume licensing server, some of the product key and activation tracking data may be spoofed, limiting Microsoft’s ability to gather legitimate license information.

0

The only information required to activate is an installation ID (and, for Office XP and Office XP family products such as Visio 2002, the name of the country in which the product is being installed). The only purpose of the installation ID is to facilitate activation. It is made up of two components: the product ID generated from the product key and a hardware hash generated from the PC’s hardware configuration (for Windows XP SP1 and later only, a third component, the product key itself, was added to deter pirates). Microsoft Product Activation uses a hash algorithm to generate the hardware identifier and does not scan the customer’s hard drive, detect any personal information, or determine the make, model or manufacturer of the PC or its components. For example, let’s assume that a hash of the PC’s color is used as part of the installation ID. The hash could be the high four bits of the color.

0

A Programmer wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:30:54 GMT, Leythos wrote: > > >>That’s not true, Linux has it’s faults and security risks also, and >>anyone that really uses Linux knows that for the truth. > > > Linux also doesn’t have fiercely anti-consumer technologies in it such > as WPA and WGA. Those that make Linux aren’t out to harm me, the > consumer. That’s today. What about tomorrow? Look at how Microsoft got to the top of the heap. In the early 1980’s, it was not much larger than a start-up. Just wait until some interested, cash rich organization pays off Linus Torvald and gets Linux’s soul. Then it will be the Devil to pay.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.