What do evolutionists have to say about the evidence supporting the fact that man and dinosaurs co-existed?
I watched the whole thing … all three parts. I won’t engage in name-calling or ad-hominem attacks … I’ll just take the evidence in the video at face value and point out things that you yourself can consider: 1) As Swift gives dates for these objects (300 B.C., 500 A.D., etc.), … what is he basing those dates on? Could it be …. *carbon-14 dating*? Yes! He comes right out and says as much. But if he accepts the accuracy of carbon dating, then he has to say why he rejects the dating of other objects using the *same* science, at 20,000 to 40,000 years old. Is carbon-14 dating a valid way of dating objects, or not? You can’t take some of its results as accurate when you like the answer, and reject it when it doesn’t give you the answer you want. 2) Listen to the *dates* Swift is claiming … 400 B.C. 500 A.D. 1000 A.D. (that runner’s water jug) … all well *POST-FLOOD*. So if dinosaurs were NOT wiped out by Noah’s Flood, and were roaming the earth as recently as 1000 years ago (!)
