Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What does the interpretative communication imply for member states offset policies?

0
Posted

What does the interpretative communication imply for member states offset policies?

0

According to the interpretative communication, indirect non-military offsets are in general not covered by Article 296, since the latter article protects only security interests and must be interpreted in a restrictive way. This means that civil offsets must respect community rules even if they are related to a defence procurement contract that is exempted on the basis of Article 296. Moreover, the interpretative communication recalls that member states must make sure that possible offset arrangements do not adversely affect competition on markets for non-military products.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.