Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

What was wrong with Bio::Tools::Blast?

Bio blast tools wrong
0
Posted

What was wrong with Bio::Tools::Blast?

0

Bio::Tools::Blast* is no longer supported, as of BioPerl version 1.1. Nothing is really wrong with it, it has just been outgrown by a more generic approach to reports. This generic approach allows us to just write pluggable modules for FASTA and BLAST parsing while using the same framework. This is completely analogous to the Bio::SeqIO system of parsing sequence files. However, the objects produced are of the Bio::SearchIO rather than Bio::Seq variety.

0

Bio::Tools::Blast* is no longer supported, as of Bioperl version 1.1. Nothing is really wrong with it, it has just been outgrown by a more generic approach to reports. This generic approach allows us to just write pluggable modules for fasta and Blast parsing while using the same framework. This is completely analogous to the Bio::SeqIO system of parsing sequence files. However, the objects produced are of the Bio::Search rather than Bio::Seq variety.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123