What would a good conclusion be for my research paper “against animal testing” be?
It depends what arguments you used for your paper. For example, if you listed and defended these three arguments against animal testing and abuse: (1) Animal testing requires inhumane, unsanitary, unsafe, or cruel conditions that if done to humans would be outlawed, since they either reduce the quality of life or cause disease or death. Since animals are living creatures that seek to survive just as much as people do, if such test conditions are not good for humans, they are not good for any living creature. Thus, they are inherently wrong by their nature. (2) Companies that test or abuse animals do so because the focus is on profit, not on quality of life. This practice of putting commercial profits first encourages business decisions that make companies more competitive but are unhealthy for humans. (cite cases of growth hormones injected into animal stock so they develop and sell faster, but the chemicals are not good for human consumption, etc.) (3) Tolerating animal cruelty promot
