Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Whatever purposes may be served by rewarding the talented and the ambitious, why should untalented and unambitious people deserve less of the worlds glories and attentions than other people?

0
Posted

Whatever purposes may be served by rewarding the talented and the ambitious, why should untalented and unambitious people deserve less of the worlds glories and attentions than other people?

0

Because I see rewarding the talented and the ambitious as promoting excellence; and nine times out of ten I would prefer excellence to equality. (All too often mediocrity is the result of equality.) I want every student in my class to do as well as possible, for example; but the average student is, after all, pretty average. So I have naturally inclined to teach the above average students. Look, this is how I see it personally. Some teachers prefer working with the slow students because they feel more needed by them and because they want to work with the underdog. I prefer to work with the best and brightest with whom you can excel and accomplish outstanding work. Students who are “slow” can exhaust my patience quickly. Q: You talk a lot about “freedom” and quote dead white guys in your webpages. I am an East L.A. chicano (Mexican-American) who feels patriotism when I think of speaking Spanish at home with my familia, attending the Christmas posada, the annual Garfield vs. Roosevelt fo

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.