Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

When guys are visiting the old sites, they always think the area defended was from the point of launch; to over the IFC; on to the target. Probably not so?

0
Posted

When guys are visiting the old sites, they always think the area defended was from the point of launch; to over the IFC; on to the target. Probably not so?

0

(Site planning suggested that the launchers to be placed between the radar (IFC) area and the expected target area. This reduced – the difficulties of an “over-the-sholder” shot – the likelyhood of a booster landing near the IFC Several sites were configured with the possibility of a missile passing nearly over the Missile Tracking Radar. One such site is SF-88 north of San Francisco. There was no reasonable place for a launching site between the high ridge (desirable for the radars) and the Pacific Ocean to the west. The “over-the-sholder” shot, where the missile passes nearly over the Missile Tracking Radar, would normally place severe strains on the ability of the Missile Tracking Radar (MTR) to maintain track on the missile. A bit like watching an airplane go right over your head – all of a sudden you want to turn around (180 degrees) to continue watching the airplane.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.