Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why are three (3) negative tests required for affected herds?

affected herds negative tests
0
Posted

Why are three (3) negative tests required for affected herds?

0

Studies of known “positive” bulls have shown that the culture method will miss about 10–20% of infected bulls if we only test them once; testing the herd (all the bulls in the herd) once gives us an 80–90% chance of finding the disease if it’s there. If no infected bulls are found on the basis of a single culture of all bulls, then we can be 80–90% sure that the herd is “clean” (free of trichomonosis). At the second test, we are trying to find infected bulls that were not detected on the first test; this means we are looking for bulls called negative on the first test when they were infected (false negatives). After a second test we can be 80–90% + 8–9% more certain we have found all positive infected bulls, so 88–99% sure the herd is not affected with trich. A third consecutive test of all herd bulls allows us to be more than 99% sure that the entire bull herd is free of disease.

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123