Why can we use the existing modifier fields to enter the Blanket Authorization Number (BAN) when designating non-authorized services?
These existing modifier fields are reserved only for the pricing and information modifiers. Also, the state has said that they may eventually use every field in the modifiers. (Back) On the CMS 1500, why can’t we use field 24K “Reserved for Local Use” for the Blanket Identification Number (BAN) The field 24K is reserved for “other insurance paid” information. (Back) May authorization number fields be left blank for any services? No. A blank or Null Authorization Number field will cause a claim to reject. Either the unique authorization number, for authorized services or BAN for unauthorized services, must be placed in the Authorization Number field. (Back) Is there any specific order in which the Pricing and Information modifiers should be positioned in an 837P or 837I claim? The Pricing and Information Modifiers must be positioned in loop 2400, SV101, positions 3,4,5 and/or 6. Follow the order in which they appear on the Schedule A. (Back) Diagnosis codes were always submitted without
Related Questions
- Why can we use the existing modifier fields to enter the Blanket Authorization Number (BAN) when designating non-authorized services?
- Where do I put Blanket Authorization Number (BAN) on a 837P or 837I transaction claim?
- What happened to the CBH Modifier? What is the Blanket Authorization Number (BAN)?
