Why can Windows Automatic Updates (another update tool) be used instead of LANDesk?
Windows Automatic Updates lacks the flexibility, protection guarantee, and reporting features available in a part of LANDesk called Patch Manager. Updates are critical in a shared network where every user is impacted. (For those who are unfamiliar with it, Windows Automatic Update is a important safeguard for home computers.) There are several additional reasons why LANDesk is preferable. 1. Some patches/updates must be deployed outside of the time-table dictated by Windows Automatic Updates. 2. Large volume updates should be tested before implementation so as not to affect administrative systems; this can occur with LANDesk. Windows Automatic Updates is not as effective as LANDesk in handling vulnerabilities released on the same day a vulnerability is exposed (so called zero-day exploits); these need the expedited capabilities of LANDesk. 3. Individuals can disable Windows Automatic Updates, leaving gapping holes in system-wide security. 4. With LANDesk, we are able to scan and identi
