Why couldn the gaps in the present system be gradually filled in until that one final program that fills in where all others have missed?
If it will be possible to “fill in” with that one final program later, why is it not possible now? Since we agree that is what we want to do, let’s do that first so that the people suffering needlessly today can have the treatments appropriate for their conditions. Let’s compare the costs of more patchwork program plus the final necessary “fill in”, versus coming up with a rationally designed complete system that best serves each particular state or the nation as a whole. Dr. Marcia Angell: In an interview appearing in the November 6, 2000 issue of the American Prospect, Dr. Marcia Angell former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine stated that “incremental reform plans as proposed by Bush or Gore are still piecemeal and would likely backfire. They exacerbate the fragmentation, make the system even less efficient, and depress access to affordable, high-quality care. They both rely on the private sector (Bush’s more than Gore’s).” QUESTION: Why does EINO specify non-inc
Related Questions
- Why couldn the gaps in the present system be gradually filled in until that one final program that fills in where all others have missed?
- I have been using the CC2602 3-WAY Coolant Test Kit on my present system, can I still use it for the new ES program?
- Is the present list of program participants final?
