Why do famous evolutionists refuse to debate?
Evolutionists are ordered not to debate and are told why they must not contend for the Life Science Prize. They are eminently unqualified and would waste their $10,000 entry fee. A vocal proponent of refusing debates, Dr. Richard Dawkins has not published a peer reviewed article in 25+ years, if ever. His late chum, Dr. Stephen Gould, did not either. They are peas in a pod, both quack essayists advocating a 2,500 year old pagan religion masquerading as science. Neither one of them has ever presented a scintilla of scientific evidence. If you find anywhere on the planet one peer reviewed article in support of evolution published in a science journal with objective, valid, reliable, calibrated data by Richard Dawkins, or Stephen Jay Gould, or any other evolutionist please let us know. Propagandists like Richard Dawkins are out of touch with reality and hallucinate that evolution is true. Such hallucinations so withdrawn from reality are the medical dictionary definition of psychosis. His
Related Questions
- What is your comment on the debate or claims from certain quarters that the Uganda Government was shifting the world famous ABC anti-HIV/AIDS strategy in favor of abstinence, or faith against condoms or condoms being promoted against the A & B?
- Why did US president refuse an offer of a live TV debate with the Iranian president?
- Why do famous evolutionists refuse to debate?
