Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why does the construction method for the line differ from the “reference project”?

Construction differ line method
0
Posted

Why does the construction method for the line differ from the “reference project”?

0

The “reference project” was developed as the public sector’s best estimate of how the Canada Line could be built. While certain essential elements were prescribed, including the requirement for the Line to be underground from Waterfront Station to at least 46th Ave., the call for proposals invited innovation and improvement on this “reference project” wherever possible. Indeed, all proponents responded with innovation and delivered alignments and tunnel construction methods that differed from the reference project. InTransitBC, the selected contractor for the Canada Line Project, examined a range of issues in proposing their construction program and method. The proposal advanced, including the mix of cut and cover (75%) and bored tunnel (25%) construction methods achieves important benefits: Longer Tunnel The tunnel section extends beyond the minimum requirement to 49th Avenue to as far south as 64th Avenue and has less impact on long-term parking and less visual impact along Cambie St

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.