Important Notice: Our web hosting provider recently started charging us for additional visits, which was unexpected. In response, we're seeking donations. Depending on the situation, we may explore different monetization options for our Community and Expert Contributors. It's crucial to provide more returns for their expertise and offer more Expert Validated Answers or AI Validated Answers. Learn more about our hosting issue here.

Why is a service-oriented architecture like the one proposed by SIRENA better than earlier approaches such as those based on CORBA?

0
Posted

Why is a service-oriented architecture like the one proposed by SIRENA better than earlier approaches such as those based on CORBA?

0

CORBA and similar technologies, including Microsoft’s COM/DCOM, are designated as “distributed object” technologies, which define client-server relationships characterised by: · a purely synchronous interaction scheme based on remote procedure calls; · tight coupling between client-side and server-side processing, so that changes in the server-side implementation almost invariably necessitate modifications at the client side; · fine-grained, dialogue-style interactions, where each client call is interpreted according to the context created through previous calls. A central aspect of distributed object technology is the notion of object lifecycle: objects are instantiated by a factory upon request, a number of operations are performed on the object instance and some time later the instance is freed or garbage-collected. An object is identified through an object reference, which provides a unique mechanism to access the object. Objects often contain references to other objects, so that e

Related Questions

What is your question?

*Sadly, we had to bring back ads too. Hopefully more targeted.

Experts123