Why is it important to define project-specific lists?
One of the most frequently requested improvements (do a search on the task page at http://www.pgdp.net/c/tasks.php for “dictionary” and “spell”) on site over the years has been for the ability to add words to the various dictionaries used by the spell checker. WordCheck, which effectively replaced the spell checker, provides this capability through the project bad and good lists. A word placed in the project good list will not be flagged, even if it is not recognised by the aspell dictionary. This is exactly the sort of behaviour that is ideal for words that validly appear in your project but not in the standard aspell dictionary, such as proper nouns, names, technical terms and jargon, etc. Note that if the project good list is NOT populated, WordCheck will operate almost exactly the same as the old spell checker: specifically, names of characters and other such words, correctly OCRd, will all be flagged for attention when there is no need.
One of the most frequently requested improvements (do a search on the task page at http://www.pgdp.net/c/tasks.php for “dictionary” and “spell”) on site over the years has been for the ability to add words to the various dictionaries used by the spell checker. WordCheck, which effectively replaced the spell checker, provides this capability through the project bad and good lists. A word placed in the project good list will not be flagged, even if it is not recognised by the aspell dictionary. This is exactly the sort of behaviour that is ideal for words that validly appear in your project but not in the standard aspell dictionary, such as proper nouns, names, technical terms and jargon, etc. Note that if the project good list is NOT populated, WordCheck will operate almost exactly the same as the old spell checker: specifically, names of characters and other such words, correctly OCRd, will all be flagged for attention when there is no need. The utility of WordCheck for proofreaders, i
